Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Phenotypic variation in photosynthetic traits in wheat grown under field versus glasshouse conditions
Cristina R. G. Sales et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY (2022)
Opportunities and limits of controlled-environment plant phenotyping for climate response traits
Anna Langstroff et al.
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS (2022)
Contribution of climatic changes in mean and variability to monthly temperature and precipitation extremes
Karin van der Wiel et al.
COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT (2021)
Crop Phenomics and High-Throughput Phenotyping: Past Decades, Current Challenges, and Future Perspectives
Wanneng Yang et al.
MOLECULAR PLANT (2020)
Phenotyping: New Windows into the Plant for Breeders
Michelle Watt et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, VOL 71, 2020 (2020)
Genomic prediction of maize yield across European environmental conditions
Emilie J. Millet et al.
NATURE GENETICS (2019)
A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach for ecological data: Using temporal dynamics of vegetation moisture as an example
Facundo J. Oddi et al.
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2019)
Greenhouse- and Field-Measured Plant-Soil Feedbacks Are Not Correlated
Leslie E. Forero et al.
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE (2019)
Reduced CO2 fertilization effect in temperate C3 grasslands under more extreme weather conditions
W. A. Obermeier et al.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2017)
Tracking maize pollen development by the Leaf Collar Method
Kevin Begcy et al.
PLANT REPRODUCTION (2017)
rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed-effects models
Martin A. Stoffel et al.
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2017)
Elevated atmospheric [CO2] can dramatically increase wheat yields in semi-arid environments and buffer against heat waves
Glenn J. Fitzgerald et al.
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY (2016)
Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field
Hendrik Poorter et al.
NEW PHYTOLOGIST (2016)
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Douglas Bates et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2015)
The ubiquity of phenotypic plasticity in plants: a synthesis
Kattia Palacio-Lopez et al.
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2015)
Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems
Astrid Junker et al.
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE (2015)
Plantecophys - An R Package for Analysing and Modelling Leaf Gas Exchange Data
Remko A. Duursma
PLOS ONE (2015)
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Jose Luis Araus et al.
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE (2014)
Future Scenarios for Plant Phenotyping
Fabio Fiorani et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, VOL 64 (2013)
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
Dale J. Barr et al.
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE (2013)
Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth
Hendrik Poorter et al.
FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY (2012)
Temperature responses of developmental processes have not been affected by breeding in different ecological areas for 17 crop species
Boris Parent et al.
NEW PHYTOLOGIST (2012)
Glasshouse vs field experiments: do they yield ecologically similar results for assessing N impacts on peat mosses?
J. Limpens et al.
NEW PHYTOLOGIST (2012)
Global change and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants
Silvia Matesanz et al.
YEAR IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY (2010)
Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists
Shinichi Nakagawa et al.
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS (2010)
Automatic time series forecasting: The forecast package for R
Rob J. Hyndman et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2008)
Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants
M van Kleunen et al.
NEW PHYTOLOGIST (2005)
Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history
SE Sultan
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE (2000)