4.8 Article

A subset of viruses thrives following microbial resuscitation during rewetting of a seasonally dry California grassland soil

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40835-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the response of viruses and microbes in soil to wet-up. The results show that wet-up leads to a decrease in viral richness but an increase in viral biomass, and viral lysis plays an important role in microbial death following wet-up.
Viruses are abundant, ubiquitous members of soil communities that kill microbial cells, but how they respond to perturbation of soil ecosystems is essentially unknown. Here, we investigate lineage-specific virus-host dynamics in grassland soil following wet-up, when resident microbes are both resuscitated and lysed after a prolonged dry period. Quantitative isotope tracing, time-resolved metagenomics and viromic analyses indicate that dry soil holds a diverse but low biomass reservoir of virions, of which only a subset thrives following wet-up. Viral richness decreases by 50% within 24 h post wet-up, while viral biomass increases four-fold within one week. Though recent hypotheses suggest lysogeny predominates in soil, our evidence indicates that viruses in lytic cycles dominate the response to wet-up. We estimate that viruses drive a measurable and continuous rate of cell lysis, with up to 46% of microbial death driven by viral lysis one week following wet-up. Thus, viruses contribute to turnover of soil microbial biomass and the widely reported CO2 efflux following wet-up of seasonally dry soils. Rewetting of seasonally dry soils induces dramatic shifts in viral biomass and diversity. Combining stable isotope probing, metagenomics, and viromics Nicolas et al. provide evidence that viral lysis contributes to microbial turnover and the associated CO2 efflux.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available