4.8 Article

Cost-effectiveness requirements for implementing artificial intelligence technology in the Women's UK Breast Cancer Screening service

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41754-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The UK NHS Women's National Breast Screening programme uses double-reading by qualified radiology staff and independent arbitration to detect breast cancer early. However, this labor-intensive process adds pressure to a system already facing a workforce crisis. A simulation model evaluating the potential value of artificial intelligence as a second reader in the NHS suggests that it can be a viable and potentially cost-effective use of resources if non-inferiority is maintained.
The UK NHS Women's National Breast Screening programme aims to detect breast cancer early. The reference standard approach requires mammograms to be independently double-read by qualified radiology staff. If two readers disagree, arbitration by an independent reader is undertaken. Whilst this process maximises accuracy and minimises recall rates, the procedure is labour-intensive, adding pressure to a system currently facing a workforce crisis. Artificial intelligence technology offers an alternative to human readers. While artificial intelligence has been shown to be non-inferior versus human second readers, the minimum requirements needed (effectiveness, set-up costs, maintenance, etc) for such technology to be cost-effective in the NHS have not been evaluated. We developed a simulation model replicating NHS screening services to evaluate the potential value of the technology. Our results indicate that if non-inferiority is maintained, the use of artificial intelligence technology as a second reader is a viable and potentially cost-effective use of NHS resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available