4.8 Article

Structural delineation and computational design of SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies against Omicron subvariants

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39890-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, RBS antibodies resistant to Omicron mutations were selected. Y489 was identified as a vulnerable site and a common marker of broadly neutralizing antibodies. A computationally designed antibody, NIV-10/FD03, showed the ability to bind and neutralize viruses with the 486 mutation.
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants have evolved to evade receptor-binding site (RBS) antibodies that exist in diverse individuals as public antibody clones. We rationally selected RBS antibodies resilient to mutations in emerging Omicron subvariants. Y489 was identified as a site of virus vulnerability and a common footprint of broadly neutralizing antibodies against the subvariants. Multiple Y489-binding antibodies were encoded by public clonotypes and additionally recognized F486, potentially accounting for the emergence of Omicron subvariants harboring the F486V mutation. However, a subclass of antibodies broadly neutralized BA.4/BA.5 variants via hydrophobic binding sites of rare clonotypes along with high mutation-resilience under escape mutation screening. A computationally designed antibody based on one of the Y489-binding antibodies, NIV-10/FD03, was able to bind XBB with any 486 mutation and neutralized XBB.1.5. The structural basis for the mutation-resilience of this Y489-binding antibody group may provide important insights into the design of therapeutics resistant to viral escape. In this study, the authors isolated SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding site monoclonal antibodies resistant to Omicron mutations. An amino acid in the receptor binding domain, tyrosine-489, is a virus-vulnerable site and a common footprint of broadly neutralizing antibodies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available