4.8 Article

A landscape of response to drug combinations in non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39528-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combination of anti-cancer drugs is commonly used to overcome limited efficacy of single agents. Designing and testing combinations are challenging due to the heterogeneity of tumor response. Co-targeting functionally proximal genes may result in higher efficacy, offering a strategy for more efficient combinations.
Combination of anti-cancer drugs is broadly seen as way to overcome the often-limited efficacy of single agents. The design and testing of combinations are however very challenging. Here we present a uniquely large dataset screening over 5000 targeted agent combinations across 81 non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Our analysis reveals a profound heterogeneity of response across the tumor models. Notably, combinations very rarely result in a strong gain in efficacy over the range of response observable with single agents. Importantly, gain of activity over single agents is more often seen when co-targeting functionally proximal genes, offering a strategy for designing more efficient combinations. Because combinatorial effect is strongly context specific, tumor specificity should be achievable. The resource provided, together with an additional validation screen sheds light on major challenges and opportunities in building efficacious combinations against cancer and provides an opportunity for training computational models for synergy prediction. Combination of drugs within cancer treatment is a popular way to overcome resistance and increase efficacy. Here, the authors analyse over 5000 targeted agent combinations in non-small cell lung cancer to identify potentially effective drug strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available