4.5 Review

Next-Generation Sequencing-Optimal Sequencing of Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Journal

CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01454-w

Keywords

Relapsed/refractory disease; Therapy sequence; Venetoclax; BTK inhibitor; Acalabrutinib; Zanubrutinib; Pirtobrutinib; Nemtabrutinib

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aims to provide an overview of evidence-based sequencing of therapies in relapsed/refractory CLL. Results suggest that patients with late relapse benefit from identical retreatment, while class switch is favorable for those with short-lived remissions or progressive disease. Treatment for patients previously exposed to both BTK and BCL2 inhibitors is still a medical need, with promising efficacy shown in early trials of noncovalent BTKI.
Purpose of Review This research paper aims to provide an overview of evidence-based sequencing of therapies in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the era of targeted drugs.Recent Findings In the absence of data from randomized clinical trials comparing novel agents head-to-head, growing evidence suggests that patients with late relapse (> 2 years) after fixed-duration therapies benefit from identical retreatment, whereas a class switch is favorable in those with short-lived remissions or progressive disease on continuous drug intake. Treatment of patients previously exposed to both covalent inhibitors of BTK and BCL2 remains an unmet medical need. Novel drugs, in particular noncovalent BTKI, show promising efficacy in this difficult-to-treat subgroup in early clinical trials.Summary The optimal sequencing of therapies in CLL requires consideration of individual patient factors and disease characteristics. Double-refractory disease continuous to pose a clinical challenge with a focus on participation in clinical trials whenever possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available