4.6 Article

Pain assessment in intensive care units of a low-middle income country: impact of the basic educational course

Journal

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04523-7

Keywords

Pain assessment; Pain management; Critically ill patients; Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT); Educational courses; Workshop

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the baseline knowledge and practice of pain assessment in ICU patients, as well as the learning effect of a educational course. The results showed that the participants had improved average scores, with participants from metropolitan cities showing a significant improvement.
BackgroundPatients admitted to ICU usually have moderate-to-severe pain at rest and during care-related activities. The Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is a reliable and validated objective assessment tool for those patients who cannot self-report pain in ICU. The objectives of the educational course were to assess the baseline knowledge, and practice of pain assessment in critically ill patients and reassess the same in all participants of the course by comparing the results of pre and post-test.MethodsThe educational course of six hours of contact time on the use of CPOT for pain assessment in ICU patients was designed and conducted by the authors after approval from the Ethics Review Committee, Aga Khan University. This educational course was delivered at five different tertiary care hospitals in the Sindh province of Pakistan. A pre-test consisting of 25 true/false multiple-choice questions was conducted at the beginning of the course to assess the baseline knowledge, and practice of participants regarding pain assessment in critically ill patients and the same test was taken at the end of the course.ResultsA total of 205 critical care physicians and nursing staff attended the courses. Both pre-test and post-test were completed by 149 (72.6%) participants, of which 53 (35.6%) were female and 96 (64.4%) were male. The mean pre-test score of participants was 57.83 & PLUSMN; 11.86 and the mean post-test score of participants was 67.43 & PLUSMN; 12.96 and this was statistically significant (p = < 0.01). In univariate analysis, the effect of training was significantly higher in the female gender (p = 0.0005) and in those participants, who belong to the metropolitan city (p = 0.010). In multivariate analysis, participants from non-metropolitan cities showed less improvement in post-test scores compared to those who come from the metropolitan city (p = 0.038).ConclusionsThe participating physicians and nurses showed a positive impact on the knowledge and clinical skills regarding pain assessment in CIPs. The participants from hospitals in metropolitan cities showed a significant improvement over those who were from non-metropolitan cities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available