4.5 Article

Radiomic-based Textural Analysis of Intraluminal Thrombus in Aortic Abdominal Aneurysms: A Demonstration of Automated Workflow

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12265-023-10404-7

Keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Radiomics; Thrombosis; Machine Learning; Predictive Modeling; Growth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective is to predict the growth status of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using the structural information of intraluminal thrombus (ILT) through an automated workflow. Deep-learning image segmentation models were used to generate 3D geometrical AAA models, followed by automated analysis and classification using a support vector machine. The most accurate predictive model considered four geometrical parameters, two parameters quantifying the constitution of ILT, antihypertensive medication, and the presence of co-existing coronary artery disease, achieving an AUROC of 0.89 and a total accuracy of 83%.
Our main objective is to investigate how the structural information of intraluminal thrombus (ILT) can be used to predict abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) growth status through an automated workflow. Fifty-four human subjects with ILT in their AAAs were identified from our database; those AAAs were categorized as slowly- (< 5 mm/year) or fast-growing (=5 mm/year) AAAs. In-house deep-learning image segmentation models were used to generate 3D geometrical AAA models, followed by automated analysis. All features were fed into a support vector machine classifier to predict AAA's growth status.The most accurate prediction model was achieved through four geometrical parameters measuring the extent of ILT, two parameters quantifying the constitution of ILT, antihypertensive medication, and the presence of co-existing coronary artery disease. The predictive model achieved an AUROC of 0.89 and a total accuracy of 83%. When ILT was not considered, our prediction's AUROC decreased to 0.75 (P-value < 0.001).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available