4.4 Article

Genotype-phenotype relationships in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with FUS/TLS mutations in Japan

Journal

MUSCLE & NERVE
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 398-404

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mus.25061

Keywords

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; frontotemporal dementia; fused in sarcoma; translated in liposarcoma; genetic predisposition to disease; phenotype; prospective studies

Funding

  1. Research Committee on Establishment of Novel Treatments for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
  2. Research Committee of CNS Degenerative Diseases of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  3. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [25293199, 26461288]
  4. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [201238002A]
  5. [20B-13]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H05667, 25293199, 26461288] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: We investigated possible genotype-phenotype correlations in Japanese patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FALS) carrying fused in sarcoma/translated in liposarcoma (FUS/TLS) gene mutations. Methods: A consecutive series of 111 Japanese FALS pedigrees were screened for copper/zinc superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) and FUS/TLS gene mutations. Clinical data, including onset age, onset site, disease duration, and extramotor symptoms, were collected. Results: Nine different FUS/TLS mutations were found in 12 pedigrees. Most of the patients with FUS/TLS-linked FALS demonstrated early onset in the brainstem/upper cervical region, and relatively short disease duration. A few mutations exhibited phenotypes that were distinct from typical cases. Frontotemporal dementia was present in 1 patient. Conclusions: This study revealed a characteristic phenotype in FUS/TLS-linked FALS patients in Japan. FUS/TLS screening is recommended in patients with FALS with this phenotype. Muscle Nerve54: 398-404, 2016

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available