4.4 Article

SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE IMMUNOGLOBULIN G DETECTED INCIDENTALLY ASSOCIATES WITH AUTOIMMUNE MYOPATHY

Journal

MUSCLE & NERVE
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 925-932

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mus.24970

Keywords

autoantibody; necrotizing myopathy; paraneoplastic; serological marker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Paraneoplastic autoantibody screening of 150,000 patient sera by tissue-based immunofluorescence incidentally revealed 170 with unsuspected signal recognition particle (SRP) immunoglobulin G (IgG), which is a recognized biomarker of autoimmune myopathy. Of the 77 patients with available information, 54 had myopathy. We describe the clinical/laboratory associations. Methods: Distinctive cytoplasm-binding IgG (mouse tissue substrate) prompted western blot, enzyme-linked immunoassay, and immunoprecipitation analyses. Available histories were reviewed. Results: The immunostaining pattern resembled rough endoplasmic reticulum, and mimicked Purkinje-cell cytoplasmic antibody type 1 IgG/anti-Yo. Immunoblotting revealed ribonucleoprotein reactivity. Recombinant antigens confirmed the following: SRP54 IgG specificity alone (17); SRP72 IgG specificity alone (3); both (32); or neither (2). Coexisting neural autoantibodies were identified in 28% (low titer). Electromyography revealed myopathy with fibrillation potentials; 78% of biopsies had active necrotizing myopathy with minimal inflammation, and 17% had inflammatory myopathy. Immunotherapy responsiveness was typically slow and incomplete, and relapses were frequent on withdrawal. Histologically confirmed cancers (17%) were primarily breast and hematologic, with some others. Conclusions: Autoimmune necrotizing SRP myopathy, both idiopathic and paraneoplastic, is underdiagnosed in neurological practice. Serological screening aids early diagnosis. Cancer surveillance and appropriate immunosuppressant therapy may improve outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available