Journal
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14417
Keywords
fast-track surgery (FTS); minimally invasive; radical prostatectomy (RP); VAS scores; wound infection
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluated the impact of fast track surgery (FTS) on radical prostatectomy (RP). The results showed that FTS can reduce postoperative pain and overall complications, but there was no significant difference in terms of blood loss, operation time, and postoperative infection rate compared to conventional surgery.
Fast track surgery (FTS) is widely used in many procedures and has been shown to reduce complications and accelerate recovery. However, no studies have been conducted to assess their effectiveness in treating wounds after radical prostatectomy (RP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of FTS on RP. We went through 4 major databases. A study was conducted by PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science to determine the effect of comparison of FTS versus conventional surgery in RP on postoperative wound complications as of 1 July 2023. Based on the review of literature, data extraction and literature quality assessment, we conducted meta-analyses with RevMan 5.3. In the course of the study, the researchers selected 6 of the 404 studies to be analysed according to exclusion criteria. Data analysis showed that the FTS method reduced the postoperative pain associated with VAS and also decreased the rate of postoperative complications in post-surgical patients. However, there was no significant difference between FTS and conventional surgery in terms of blood loss, operation time, and postoperative infection rate. Therefore, generally speaking, FTS has less impact on postoperative complications in patients with minimal invasive prostatic cancer, but it does reduce postoperative pain and total postoperative complications.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available