4.6 Article

The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical site wound infection after immediate breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer: A meta-analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14337

Keywords

breast cancer; immediate breast reconstruction; meta-analysis; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; surgical site wound infection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using meta-analysis, this study evaluated the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on wound infection during immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after breast cancer. The analysis of 14 studies involving 3401 patients showed that NACT did not significantly increase the risk of surgical site infection during IBR. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the safety of IBR in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Using a meta-analysis approach, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on the incidence of surgical site wound infection during immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following breast cancer. The aim was to provide evidence-based support for the prevention of wound surgical site infection during IBR after breast cancer surgery. Relevant literature on the effects of NACT on IBR in patients with breast cancer published up until May 2023, was retrieved from various databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang databases, and China Biology Medicine Database. Two researchers performed the literature screening, data collection, and quality assessment of the included studies independently. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata version 17.0. Fourteen studies involving 3401 patients (599 in the intervention group and 2802 in the control group) were included in the analysis. The incidence of surgical site infection in the NACT group was higher than that in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (7.17% vs. 4.85%, odds ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.50, p = 0.902). These findings suggest that NACT does not increase the risk of surgical site infection during IBR. However, owing to the variation in sample size and literature quality among the included studies, randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the safety of IBR in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available