3.8 Article

A Model of the Flow of a Nanomedium Removing Particles from the Electroerosion Zone

Journal

SURFACE ENGINEERING AND APPLIED ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 556-568

Publisher

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.3103/S1068375523050058

Keywords

particle; dynamics; removal of particles; random medium; erosion zone; nanotube

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A model was proposed to study the changes in the physical properties and structure of a homogeneous medium during the fabrication of micro- and nanoholes in materials. The model takes into account the influence of erosion particles carried over by the medium from the electroerosion zone. Changes in the properties and parameters of the medium were observed at different angles of the erosion zone. The model was verified using similarity theory and showed agreement with experimental results.
A model was proposed and studied to explore the changes in the dynamics of the physical properties and structure of a homogeneous medium in the anode-cathode (SWCNT-surface) gap due to the influence of stochastic emission of erosion particles into the random interval during their carryover by the medium from the electroerosion zone during making micro- and nanoholes in the material. The model takes into account the influence exerted on the properties of the combined flow by the dynamics of the motion of a tool (SWCNT-electrode), the orientation of the erosion zone and particle removal, and the variable density of the homogeneous phase of the flow. Changes were identified in the properties and parameters of the combined flow during the carryover of its erosion particles at different angles of orientation of the erosion zone. Verification using the methods of similarity theory and practice showed satisfactory agreement between the modeling results, numerical experiments, and natural experiments conducted by other researchers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available