4.5 Article

Multi-feature output deep network ensemble learning for face recognition and verification

Journal

SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-023-02798-3

Keywords

Face recognition; Deep convolutional neural networks; Ensemble learning; Feature selection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a multi-feature DCNN ensemble learning method based on machine learning is proposed for facial recognition and verification. By expanding the feature dimension of the DCNN model and utilizing machine learning methods for secondary learning, more discriminative features are extracted, leading to improved recognition and validation accuracy of existing DCNN models.
In facial recognition systems, the sample size of face data is often limited, making it difficult to improve recognition performance through transfer learning using pretrained deep neural network models (DCNNs). Furthermore, in complex environments, the recognition performance of a single DCNN is greatly weakened. To address these issues, this paper proposes a multi-feature DCNN ensemble learning method based on machine learning for facial recognition and verification. First, the characterization ability of face details is enhanced by expanding the output feature dimension of the DCNN model. Then, machine learning methods with few or no parameters are used for secondary learning on small sample databases to extract more discriminative features. In this work, we utilized several mainstream network models such as ResNet50 and SENet to expand and integrate features. The experimental results show that our proposed method can improve the recognition and validation accuracy of existing DCNN models by up to 10%. Moreover, this method does not require training the network, has relatively low computational costs, and has a wide range of practical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available