4.6 Review

Animal Models for Henipavirus Research

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v15101980

Keywords

henipaviruses; animal models; Nipah virus; Hendra virus; zoonosis; vaccines; antivirals; monoclonal antibodies; pathogenesis; medical countermeasures

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV) are zoonotic paramyxoviruses that emerged nearly thirty years ago and pose a grave threat to public health. Animal models, including nonhuman primates, rodents, and ferrets, have been instrumental in understanding the pathogenesis and transmission of HeV and NiV. Nonhuman primates have shown the closest resemblance to human HNV disease.
Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV) are zoonotic paramyxoviruses in the genus Henipavirus (HNV) that emerged nearly thirty years ago. Outbreaks of HeV and NiV have led to severe respiratory disease and encephalitis in humans and animals characterized by a high mortality rate. Despite the grave threat HNVs pose to public health and global biosecurity, no approved medical countermeasures for human use currently exist against HeV or NiV. To develop candidate vaccines and therapeutics and advance the field's understanding of HNV pathogenesis, animal models of HeV and NiV have been instrumental and remain indispensable. Various species, including rodents, ferrets, and nonhuman primates (NHPs), have been employed for HNV investigations. Among these, NHPs have demonstrated the closest resemblance to human HNV disease, although other animal models replicate some key disease features. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the currently available animal models (mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, ferrets, cats, dogs, nonhuman primates, horses, and swine) to support HNV research. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of each model for conducting pathogenesis and transmission studies on HeV and NiV and for the evaluation of medical countermeasures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available