4.6 Review

Contemporaneous SARS-CoV-2-Neutralizing Antibodies Mediated by N-glycan Shields

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v15102079

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; original antigenic sin; cross-reactive lymphocytes; N-glycan

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations and glycosylation can decrease the sensitivity of immunogenic epitopes to neutralizing antibodies. Despite this, previous antibodies or T cell receptors can still bind and neutralize the virus, even with reduced affinity. The paper argues for universal vaccination to prevent further mutations and suggests the development of vaccines and drugs targeting new epitopes.
Mutations and the glycosylation of epitopes can convert immunogenic epitopes into non-immunogenic ones via natural selection or evolutionary pressure, thereby decreasing their sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies. Based on Thomas Francis's theory, memory B and T cells induced during primary infections or vaccination will freeze the new mutated epitopes specific to naive B and T cells from the repertoire. On this basis, some researchers argue that the current vaccines derived from the previous strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus do not increase immunity and may also prevent the immune response against new epitopes. However, evidence shows that even if the binding affinity is reduced, the previous antibodies or T cell receptors (TCRs) can still bind to this new epitope of the Beta, Gamma, and Delta variant if their concentration is high enough (from a booster injection) and neutralize the virus. This paper presents some convincing immunological reasons that may challenge this theory and argue for the continuation of universal vaccination to prevent further mutations of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Simultaneously, the information presented can be used to develop vaccines that target novel epitopes or create new recombinant drugs that do not lose their effectiveness when the virus mutates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available