4.3 Article

Distinct pattern of lesion distribution in multiple sclerosis is associated with different circulating T-helper and helper-like innate lymphoid cell subsets

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 1025-1030

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458516662726

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; lesion distribution; T(H)1; T(H)17; innate lymphoid cell; lymphoid tissue inducer

Funding

  1. Collaborative Research Centre CRC [TR128]
  2. CRC1009 breaking barriers
  3. Stiftung Neuromedizin
  4. Krankheitsbezogene Kompetenznetz Multiple Sklerose (Disease Related Competence Network for Multiple Sclerosis) - Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ 01GI0907]
  5. German Research Foundation (DFG) [GR3946/2-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Distinct lesion topography in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) might be due to different antigen presentation and/or trafficking routes of immune cells into the central nervous system (CNS). Objective: To investigate whether distinct lesion patterns in multiple sclerosis (MS) might be associated with a predominance of distinct circulating T-helper cell subset as well as their innate counterparts. Methods: Flow cytometric analysis of lymphocytes derived from the peripheral blood of patients with exclusively cerebral (n = 20) or predominantly spinal (n = 12) disease manifestation. Results: Patients with exclusively cerebral or preferential spinal lesion manifestation were associated with increased proportions of circulating granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) producing T(H)1 cells or interleukin (IL)-17-producing T(H)17 cells, respectively. In contrast, proportions of peripheral IL-17/IL-22-producing lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi), the innate counterpart of T(H)17 cells, were enhanced in RRMS patients with exclusively cerebral lesion topography. Conclusions: Distinct T-helper and T-helper-like innate lymphoid cell (ILC) subsets are associated with different lesion topography in RRMS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available