4.3 Article

Altered intestinal permeability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A pilot study

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 442-446

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458516652498

Keywords

Biomarkers; relapsing-remitting; twins; intestinal permeability; gut absorption; microbiota

Funding

  1. Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM) [2013/R/2]
  2. ARSEP-Fondation pour l'aide a la recherche sur la sclerose en plaque
  3. Italian Ministry of Health
  4. FISM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Alterations of intestinal permeability (IP) may contribute to the pathophysiology of immune-mediated diseases. Objective: We investigated the possible association between IP changes and multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: We studied 22 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and 18 age- and sex-matched healthy donors (HDs), including five twin pairs (one concordant, and four discordant for disease). Measurement of lactulose (L) and mannitol (M; two non-metabolized sugars) levels in urine samples, after an oral load, allowed to quantify gut dysfunction. Results: The proportion of participants with increased IP was significantly higher in patients than in HDs (16/22 (73%) versus 5/18 (28%); p=0.001). Accordingly, the L/M urinary ratio showed significantly higher values in patients than in controls (p=0.0284). Urinary mannitol concentration was significantly lower in patients than in controls (p=0.022), suggesting a deficit of absorption from intestinal lumen. Such changes did not appear related to patients' clinical-radiological features. Conclusion: The relatively high proportion of IP changes in RR-MS patients seems to confirm our work hypothesis and warrants more work to confirm the result on a larger sample, and to understand the implications for related immunological disturbances and intestinal microbiota alterations. Our finding may also have relevance for oral treatments, recently introduced in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available