4.4 Article

Risk factors associated with pressure ulcer recurrence after reconstruction: Analysis of a national database

Journal

WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13110

Keywords

decubitus ulcer; flap reconstruction; ischial ulcer; pressure ulcer; sacral pressure ulcer; trochanteric ulcer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify the patient traits and comorbidities associated with pressure injury recurrence after reconstruction. A retrospective cohort study using an insurance claims database was conducted. Risk factors for recurrence after reconstruction were identified through multiple logistic regression analysis. Hypoalbuminemia, paraplegia, and osteomyelitis were associated with recurrence. Prior to reconstruction, patients with osteomyelitis and hypoalbuminemia should have their nutrition and infection optimized.
In this study, we sought to clarify the patient traits and comorbidities that are associated with pressure injury recurrence following pressure injury reconstruction. An insurance claims database, PearlDiver, was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study. The two cohorts included patients who underwent pressure injury reconstruction without recurrence and patients who experienced recurrence with subsequent reconstruction. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for recurrence after reconstruction. Recurrence was associated with hypoalbuminemia (p < 0.05), paraplegia (p < 0.05), and osteomyelitis (p < 0.05). In patients with osteomyelitis, primary closure was associated with recurrence (p < 0.05) while flap reconstruction was not (p > 0.05). Osteomyelitis was not associated with recurrence after flap reconstruction. Prior to reconstruction, patients with osteomyelitis and hypoalbuminemia should have their nutrition and infection optimised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available