4.7 Article

Fatigue and recrystallization evolution of carbide-free bainitic layer under high-stress rolling sliding contact

Journal

WEAR
Volume 526, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2023.204958

Keywords

Rolling contact fatigue; Sliding; Dislocation slip; Carbide-free bainite; Recrystallization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fatigue behavior of a new bearing steel with carbide-free bainite was investigated. The rolling contact fatigue life of the bainitic layer was significantly higher than that of the commercial GCr15 steel sample. The improved toughness of the bainitic layer was attributed to the presence of bainitic ferrite and retained austenite.
The rolling contact fatigue behavior of a newly developed bearing steel with carbide-free bainite, modified by a combination of tungsten inert gas surface melting and subsequent isothermal transformation was investigated. The rolling sliding tests were conducted to determine the vibration response and rolling contact fatigue life. The rolling contact fatigue life of the bainitic layer is 6.623 x 106 cycles, significantly higher than that of the commercial GCr15 steel sample (4.496 x 106 cycles). Focused ion beam technology and transmission Kikuchi diffraction studies on fatigue-tested samples showed that the toughness of the bainitic layer could be improved by the bainitic ferrite and retained austenite, which recrystallizes and forms nanocrystals during the rolling contact fatigue process. Furthermore, high-resolution transmission electron microscope study elucidated that the bainitic layer has better dislocation slip ability and is more prone to recrystallization on the rolling contact fatigue surface, preventing the rapid expansion of fatigue cracks. Moreover, the effect of dissolution of the Fe3C in GCr15 steel on the structure of distorted body-centered cubic crystals and pitting defects was also comparatively investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available