4.5 Article

Advanced machine learning-based kharif maize evapotranspiration estimation in semi-arid climate

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2023.253

Keywords

category boosting; crop coefficient; crop evapotranspiration; cross-correlation; machine learning; simple additive weighting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed and evaluated machine learning algorithms for estimating daily maize crop evapotranspiration in semi-arid conditions using limited weather variables. Five algorithms were examined and it was found that the category boosting and artificial neural network models were superior during training, while the support vector machine and artificial neural network models were excellent during testing. Wind speed was found to be the most influential variable in evapotranspiration estimation. The SVM and ANN models produced promising results with high accuracy, making them suitable for precise estimation of evapotranspiration in a semi-arid climate.
This work focuses on developing and evaluating the efficacy of machine learning (ML) algorithms to estimate daily maize crop evapotranspiration under limited input weather variables in semi-arid climatic conditions. Five ML algorithms, namely, category boosting (CB), linear regression, support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and stochastic gradient descent, were developed based on highly correlated inputs combinations and examined for ETc estimation at an experimental site, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi. The results show that CB- and ANN-based models were superior to other models in the training phase. However, the SVM- and ANN-based models were excellent during testing, regardless of the number of input variables used. Notably, the wind speed was the most influential in ETc estimation. By utilizing complete sets of weather inputs, the SVM- and ANN-based models produced promising outcomes, exhibiting coefficient of determination (R-2) of 0.986 and 0.987, mean absolute error of 0.121 and 0.124 (mm day(-1)), root-mean-square error of 0.172 and 0.165 (mm day(-1)), and mean absolute percentage error of 4.37 and 4.57%, respectively. Overall, these two models (i.e., SVM and ANN) were comparable; therefore, these models may be adopted for precise estimation of ETc in a semi-arid climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available