Journal
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 368-376Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.05.011
Keywords
Material Recovery Facility; Techno-Economic Analysis; Life Cycle Assessment; Recycling; Waste Management
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) play a crucial role in achieving a circular economy by separating valuable recyclables from complex waste streams. This study uses techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the economic feasibility and environmental impacts of a standalone, single-stream MRF processing 120,000 tonnes per year. Results show that waste composition significantly affects costs and global warming potential, while parameters like facility capacity, fixed capital cost, and waste tipping fees impact the economic viability of MRF operations.
Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) are crucial players in achieving a circular economy. MRFs receive complex waste streams and separate valuable recyclables from these mixtures. This study conducts techno-economic analysis (TEA) to estimate the net present value (NPV) and life cycle assessment (LCA) to estimate different environmental impacts of a commercial scale standalone, single-stream MRF to assess the economic feasibility and environmental impacts of recovering valuable recyclables from an MRF processing 120,000 tonnes per year (t/y). The TEA employs a discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFROR) analysis over a 20-year facility lifetime, along with a sensitivity analysis on the impact of different operating and economic parameters. Results show that the total fixed cost of building the MRF facility is $23 MM, and the operating cost is $45.48/tonne. The NPV of the MRF can vary from $3.57 MM to $60 MM, while 100-year global warming potential can range from 5.98 to 8.53 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq) per tonne of MSW. We have also found that MSW composition (arising from regional effects) significantly impacts costs, 100-year global warming potential, and other impact categories such as acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ecotoxicity, ozone depletion, photochemical oxidation, carcinogenic effects, and non-carcinogenic effects. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis indicate that waste composition and market prices significantly impact the profitability of the MRF, and the waste composition mostly impacts global warming potential. Our analysis also indicates that facility capacity, fixed capital cost, and waste tipping fees are vital parameters that affect the economic viability of MRF operations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available