4.3 Article

Novel gene fusion discovery in Spitz tumours and its relevance in diagnostics

Journal

VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03649-9

Keywords

Dermatopathology; Gene fusion; Next-generation sequencing (NGS); Spitz nevus; Spitz tumour

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In addition to morphologic analysis, molecular diagnostic work up of Spitz tumours is often of great value for their accurate diagnosis/classification. Nowadays, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the predominant screening method in molecular diagnostics. We describe a series of four Spitz tumour samples in which distinct gene fusions were detected by hybridisation-based capture NGS. Two of these fusions are not previously described. All 4 fusions were confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR. These findings demonstrate the need for molecular analysis that can detect unknown fusions in Spitz neoplasms for optimal diagnosis.
In addition to morphologic analysis, molecular diagnostic work up of Spitz tumours is often of great value for their accurate diagnosis/classification. Nowadays, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the predominant screening method in molecular diagnostics. Up to 80% of these melanocytic neoplasms comprise gene fusions as genetic anomalies for which the driver codes for a protein harbouring a kinase domain. However, because of the variety of fusion partners the use of PCR-based targeted enrichment NGS methods is not recommended. We describe a series of four Spitz tumour samples in which distinct gene fusions were detected by hybridisation-based capture NGS (TPM3::ALK, LIMA1::ROS1, LRRFIP2::ROS1 and MYO5A::RET). Two of these fusions are not previously described. All 4 fusions were confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR. These findings demonstrate the need for molecular analysis that can detect unknown fusions in Spitz neoplasms for optimal diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available