4.6 Article

Coarse-grained correspondence-based ancient Sasanian coin classification by fusion of local features and sparse representation-based classifier

Journal

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 76, Issue 14, Pages 15535-15560

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-016-3856-6

Keywords

Ancient coin classification; Cultural heritage; Feature fusion; Feature selection; Kernelized sparse representation-based classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numismatics sorts out historical aspects of money. Identification and classification of coins, as a part of their duties, need years of experience. This research aims at using the knowledge of numismatics for developing an image-based classification of ancient Sassanian dynasty coins. A straightforward method is to take coins observe and reverse-side motifs into account, just like numismatics does. To this aim, three feature descriptors, Cosine transform, Wavelet transform and Bi-Directional Principal Component Analysis, are separately applied to the extracted motifs' areas to form the feature space. To cope with the 'curse of dimensionality' and increase the 'discrimination power', feature space is enriched with spatial information achieved by applying a feature selection method. Indeed, the best feature subset, which maximizes the mutual information between the joint distribution of the selected features and the classification variable, is selected using the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) method to a trade-off between thousands of features and a few hundreds of samples. One fold of our contribution dedicates to decrease the over-fitting probability of the learning model by making the Sparse Representation-based Classifier kernelized. We evaluate our method on a dataset of 573 coin images. The experimental results show that our proposed image representation is more discriminative than the competitive ones in which the system achieves a mean classification rate of 96.51 %.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available