4.6 Article

Novel valence regulation-vacuum gasification method for separation of selenium and tellurium

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 219, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112737

Keywords

Selenium-tellurium; Separation purification; Valence regulation; Vacuum gasification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Separating selenium and tellurium is a general challenge in material and non-ferrous metallurgical industries. This paper proposes a novel method that achieved efficient separation of selenium and tellurium using gas-liquid equilibrium phase diagram and valence regulation-vacuum gasification technique.
It is a general challenge to separate similar elements in material and non-ferrous metallurgical industries. Due to their unique semiconductor properties, selenium and tellurium as well as their separation have been increasingly drawing the attention of worldwide research. Currently, they are mainly extracted and recycled from copper anode slime. The conventional methods used for separating selenium and tellurium have several drawbacks, including low separation efficiency, lengthy processes, and significant environmental pollution. To address these issues, in this paper, the gas-liquid equilibrium (VLE) phase diagram of selenium-base binary alloy at full con-centration was drawn according to the theory of gas-liquid equilibrium, the limitation of single vacuum distillation separation technique is theoretically interpreted, and a novel valence regulation-vacuum gasification method is proposed, which shows a superior selenium/tellurium separation rate of 99.98 % and a high material volatilization rate around 90 % achieved with hydrogen peroxide addition. The optimal amount of hydrogen peroxide for the separation process is determined as 1.1 L/kg. The promising results suggest potential of the new method for effectively separating other similar elements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available