4.5 Article

Immune responses and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome patients in Taiwan

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 41, Issue 41, Pages 5940-5945

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.020

Keywords

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; COVID-19; Vaccination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the immune responses and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in Taiwan. The results showed that the vaccines effectively protected aHUS patients from severe COVID-19 complications without significant safety concerns. Transplant aHUS patients had lower immune response titers, indicating a need for additional vaccine doses.
Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is a rare, life-threatening disorder which can be triggered by COVID 19 infection and COVID 19 vaccination then induce multiple organ failure. Our study is the first to evaluate immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination and safety in a cohort of patients in a local single-center study in Taiwan.. Results indicate that vaccines effectively shield aHUS patients from severe COVID-19 complications without significant safety concerns. A double booster dose for the third vaccine is essential for optimal efficacy. Anti complement therapy did not influence vaccination effectiveness. Transplant aHUS patients had the lowest immune response titers, indicating a need for additional vaccine doses. Compared to healthcare workers, aHUS patients had poor T-cell responses. We noted a superior trend with mixed-type COVID-19 vaccinations in aHUS patients, while fixed-type mRNA demonstrated better results in healthcare workers. Our findings endorse COVID19 vaccination as a potent strategy to safeguard aHUS patients from severe complications, emphasizing the importance of vigilant monitoring pre-and post-vaccination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available