4.4 Article

Regularization techniques for 3D surface reconstruction from four quadrant backscattered electron detector images

Journal

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
Volume 250, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113746

Keywords

Surface reconstruction; Surface regularization; Scanning electron microscopy; Backscattered electrons

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the possibility of using regularization techniques (Tichonov's and Dirichlet's) for surface reconstruction from FQBSD images in scanning electron microscopy is demonstrated. By reducing distortions caused by sensitivity variations among detector quadrants or imprecise alignment of the FQBSD, these techniques greatly improve the quality of 3D surface reconstruction.
In scanning electron microscopy (SEM), a four quadrants backscattered electron detector (FQBSD) provides signals that can be combined to obtain a tridimensional reconstruction of the surface. The main challenge of the reconstruction operation consists of integrating the gradient field obtained as the normalized signal difference from each pair of opposite quadrants. Owing to the presence of electronic noise that eventually turns into image noise, a least square integration approach has been widely adopted for surface reconstruction. In the present work, we demonstrate the possibility of adopting regularization techniques (Tichonov's and Dirichlet's) to the surface reconstruction from FQBSD images to reduce the distortions due to sensitivity variations amongst the detector quadrants or an imprecise alignment of the FQBSD with the gun axis. This allows for a substantial improvement in the 3D surface reconstruction quality in terms of resolution and reduction of artifacts. These procedures have been experimentally validated on AISI 316L stainless steel polished surfaces with hardness indentation and on laser-patterned aluminum and silicon samples showing promising results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available