4.7 Article

Prediction of ground subsidence by shield tunneling using ensemble learning

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105343

Keywords

Shield tunnel; Ground subsidence; Ensemble learning; Risk forecast

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of shield construction parameters on ground subsidence and establishes intelligent prediction methods to forecast it. The findings provide valuable insights for preventing and mitigating excessive subsidence.
This study addresses a significant issue related to shield construction, namely the impact of shield construction parameters on ground subsidence. Shield tunnels, owing to their concealed construction, often lead to ground subsidence, causing severe disruptions to ground facilities, potential collapse, and consequent casualties and property loss. Most calculation methods for ground subsidence have a delay, making it difficult to predict ground subsidence in advance based on construction parameters. Therefore, this study collates over 1500 cases of shield construction in China and summarises the impact mechanisms of shield construction on ground subsidence through a detailed study of natural factors, engineering geology, types of structures, and types of construction parameters. Based on the influence law of the data, this study establishes three intelligent prediction methods to forecast ground subsidence. To select the hyperparameters in the models more effectively, a Bayesian optimisation algorithm was utilised. Through a comparative analysis of the models, a subsidence prediction method that is more in line with the construction characteristics and exhibits high accuracy was determined. The findings of this study serve as a valuable resource for predicting ground subsidence resulting from shield construction, enabling timely adjustments to construction parameters and the implementation of preventive measures to mitigate excessive subsidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available