4.7 Article

Machine learning-based prediction of friction torque and friction coefficient in statically loaded radial journal bearings

Journal

TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108592

Keywords

Machine learning; Radial journal bearing; Friction torque; Friction coefficient; Tribological systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this research, machine learning algorithms were used to predict the variations of friction torque and friction coefficient in a statically loaded radial journal bearing. The effects of temperature, bearing load, and rotational speed on these variations were investigated. The results showed that machine learning models can successfully predict the variations of friction torque and friction coefficient. Additionally, a comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of different machine learning models. These findings have important implications for the design and optimization of statically loaded radial journal bearings.
In this research, we utilized machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the friction torque and friction coef-ficient in a statically loaded radial journal bearing. The study investigated the influence of temperature, bearing load, and rotational speed on the variation in friction torque and friction coefficient. Three different ML algo-rithms, namely, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Regression Trees (RT), were applied to experimental tribological data. Performance assessment demonstrated that ML-based models can successfully predict the variation of friction torque and friction coefficient. Furthermore, we conducted a comparative analysis to evaluate the performance of ML-based models in relation to each other. The results of this study have useful implications for the design and optimization of statically loaded radial journal bearings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available