4.4 Article

Improving compressive sensing in MRI with separate magnitude and phase priors

Journal

MULTIDIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 1109-1131

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11045-016-0383-6

Keywords

Compressed sensing; Image reconstruction; Magnetic resonance imaging; Regularization; Image prior

Funding

  1. CNPq [301064/2009-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compressive sampling/compressed sensing (CS) has shown that it is possible to perfectly reconstruct non-bandlimited signals sampled well below the Nyquist rate. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is one of the applications that has benefited from this theory. Sparsifying operators that are effective for real-valued images, such as finite difference and wavelet transform, also work well for complex-valued MRI when phase variations are small. As phase variations increase, even if the phase is smooth, the sparsifying ability of these operators for complex-valued images is reduced. If the phase is known, it is possible to remove it from the complex-valued image before applying the sparsifying operator. Another alternative is to use the sparsifying operator on the magnitude of the image, and use a different operator for the phase, i.e., one related to a smoothness enforcing prior. The proposed method separates the priors for the magnitude and for the phase, in order to improve the applicability of CS to MRI. An improved version of previous approaches, by ourselves and other authors, is proposed to reduce computational cost and enhance the quality of the reconstructed complex-valued MR images with smooth phase. The proposed method utilizes penalty for the transformed magnitude, and a modified penalty for phase, together with a non-linear conjugated gradient optimization. Also, this paper provides an extensive set of experiments to understand the behavior of previous methods and the new approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available