4.6 Article

Characterization of the human immune cell network at the gingival barrier

Journal

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 1163-1172

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mi.2015.136

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDCR
  2. Wellcome Trust [097820/Z/11/B, 105610/Z/14/Z]
  3. Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M025977/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/M025977/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Wellcome Trust [105610/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The oral mucosa is a barrier site constantly exposed to rich and diverse commensal microbial communities, yet little is known of the immune cell network maintaining immune homeostasis at this interface. We have performed a detailed characterization of the immune cell subsets of the oral cavity in a large cohort of healthy subjects. We focused our characterization on the gingival interface, a particularly vulnerable mucosal site, with thin epithelial lining and constant exposure to the tooth adherent biofilm. In health, we find a predominance of T cells, minimal B cells, a large presence of granulocytes/neutrophils, a sophisticated network of professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and a small population of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) policing the gingival barrier. We further characterize cellular subtypes in health and interrogate shifts in immune cell populations in the common oral inflammatory disease periodontitis. In disease, we document an increase in neutrophils and an upregulation of interleukin-17(IL-17) responses. We identify the mainsource of IL-17 in health and Periodontitis within the CD4(+) T-cell compartment. Collectively, our studies provide a first view of the landscape of physiologic oral immunity and serve as a baseline for the characterization of local immunopathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available