4.7 Article

Fixed routing or demand-responsive? Agent-based modelling of autonomous first and last mile services in light-rail systems

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103676

Keywords

Agent-based simulation; Autonomous transit; First and last mile transport; Demand-responsive services; Cost-benefit analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the potential of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology for enhancing first and last mile services for a light-rail station. The findings indicate that, for a high-frequency light-rail feeder system, fixed routing is the preferred option, but demand-responsive services can be as effective as fixed routing in off-peak hours. A combination of the two services could be beneficial in certain contexts. Urban sprawl has an impact on the performance of the system, with demand-responsive services becoming relatively better when urban sprawl increases, while fixed routing remains superior across most key-performance indicators. Cost-benefit analysis is employed to assess the performance of the different services.
This paper examines the potential of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology for enhancing first and last mile services for a light-rail station. We use an event-and agent-based simulation model to compare the performance of fixed and demand-responsive routing services. The routing of on-demand services is based on a matching algorithm in which incoming passenger requests are prioritized and assigned to vehicles under capacity constraints. Our findings indicate that, for a high-frequency light-rail feeder system, fixed routing is the preferred option, even with the assumed reduction in operational costs due to driver-less operations. However, we also observe that demand-responsive services can be as effective as fixed routing in off-peak hours, provided the heuristics for matching passengers to vehicles are effective. This implies that a combination of the two services could be beneficial in certain contexts. In addition, our results demonstrate that urban sprawl has an impact on the performance of the system, with the demand-responsive services becoming relatively better when urban sprawl increases, while the fixed routing remains superior across most key-performance indicators. To assess the performance of the different services, we employ cost-benefit analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available