4.6 Article

Mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue for repairing acute sciatic nerve injury in a rabbit model

Journal

TISSUE & CELL
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2023.102162

Keywords

Adipose tissue; Bone marrow; Mesenchymal stem cells; Rabbit; Sciatic nerve injury

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peripheral nerve injury is a common clinical condition that often leads to permanent impairment in about 50% of cases. This study compared the regenerative potential of bone marrow-derived (BM) and adipose tissue-derived (AD) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in an acute rabbit sciatic nerve injury model. The results showed that MSCs can improve sciatic nerve healing, but complete regeneration was not achieved at day 90, with BM-MSCs showing a better response than AD-MSCs.
Peripheral nerve injury is one of the common disabling clinical conditions and around 50% of the cases end up in permanent impairment. Due to the lack of effective treatment options regenerative medicine employing stem cells is being evaluated. The presented study evaluated and compared regeneration potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow (BM) and adipose tissue (AD) in acute rabbit sciatic nerve injury (axonotmesis) model. A total of n = 54 grey giant rabbits were made subject of the study and divided equally into 3 groups: Control, BM-MSCs in Collagen I and AD-MSCs in Collagen I as per the treatment given. Iliac crest BM and omental AD was harvested from the same donor for isolation and culture of MSCs. The repair of sciatic nerve injury was evaluated on days 60 and 90. The clinical and histopathological scores and SEM morphology was better in cell treated groups as compared to the control. Morphology and histological studies revealed injured nerve in different levels of regenerative process. Gene expression was more than double for N-Cadherin in cell treated groups as compared to the control, especially at day 60. Between cell treated groups, BM-MSCs group showed better response as compared to the AD-MSCs, although statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). Incomplete nerve regeneration observed under various diagnostic parameters was in compliance to the incomplete clinical recovery at day 90. It was concluded that MSCs may improve sciatic nerve healing but fall short of complete regeneration at day 90, although BM-MSCs may have an edge over AD-MSCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available