4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical investigation of bolted steel endplate with bonded sleeve end connections for pultruded GFRP circular tubular hollow beams

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.111193

Keywords

Bolted endplate; Bonded sleeve; GFRP; Circular tubular; Pultruded; Connection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an experimental and numerical investigation on bolted steel endplates with bonded sleeve connections for connecting pultruded GFRP circular tubular beams. The moment-rotational responses were studied in terms of initial rotational stiffness, moment capacity, and rotation capacity. The effect of endplate thickness and bonded sleeve length was also examined. The failure modes include bending and yielding of thinner endplates, as well as splitting failure in the bonded GFRP beam region for thicker endplates with low bonded sleeve lengths.
The paper presents an experimental and numerical investigation of bolted steel endplates with bonded sleeve connections developed for connecting pultruded glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) circular tubular beams. The moment-rotational responses were investigated in detail in terms of initial rotational stiffness, moment capacity, and rotation capacity for all the connections. The effect of endplate thickness and bonded sleeve length was also investigated. Predominant failure modes include bending and yielding of thinner endplates, while thicker endplates with low bonded sleeve lengths exhibit splitting failure in the bonded GFRP beam region. Available design codes for steel joints were used to classify the developed connections in terms of rigidity and strength. The failure modes from the finite element models were well matched by the experimental observations, which include the deformation of the endplate and the cohesive failure within the bonded sleeve region with the GFRP beam.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available