4.4 Article

Evaluating the risk factors for the development of benign disorders of defaecation: a surgical perspective

Journal

TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 847-857

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02843-w

Keywords

Risk factors; Faecal incontinence; Constipation; Delphi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used a Delphi technique to identify and evaluate risk factors for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence. Opioid analgesia, eating disorders, and history of abuse were identified as the most important independent risk factors for chronic constipation. Third- or fourth-degree tear, instrumental delivery, and grand multiparity were rated as the most important risk factors for faecal incontinence.
PurposeThere remains uncertainty as to which risk factors are important for the development of defaecatory problems as a result of heterogeneity of published evidence. Understanding the impact of risk factors may be important in selecting targets for disease prevention or reversal. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate risk factors for faecal incontinence and chronic constipation.MethodsRisk factors for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence were long-listed from scientific literature, then anonymously evaluated (by 50 predominantly colorectal surgical experts from the UK Pelvic Floor Society) using a Delphi technique. Each risk factor was rated as independent, a co-factor, or not a risk factor. Independent risk factors were rated between 1 (not important) and 10 (critically important) with mean (& PLUSMN; standard deviation) calculated.ResultsThirty-eight risk factors for chronic constipation were evaluated. Eighteen were classed as independent and 16 as co-factors. Opioid analgesia (7.87 & PLUSMN; 2.05), eating disorders (7.80 & PLUSMN; 1.72), and history of abuse (7.70 & PLUSMN; 1.89) were scored as most important independent risk factors. Female sex (6.60 & PLUSMN; 2.02) was considered an independent risk factor but increasing age was rated a co-factor. Thirty-three risk factors for faecal incontinence were evaluated. Twenty were classed as independent and eight as co-factors. Third- or fourth-degree tear (8.88 & PLUSMN; 1.57), instrumental delivery (8.47 & PLUSMN; 1.58), and grand multiparity (8.00 & PLUSMN; 1.63) were rated most important. Increasing age (7.41 & PLUSMN; 2.14) and female sex (7.58 & PLUSMN; 2.05) were both considered independent risk factors.ConclusionsSeveral risk factors for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence were selected by Delphi approach. These factors will feed forward into Bayesian models of disease prediction that combine data and expert knowledge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available