4.4 Article

Roles of an Atmospheric River and a Cutoff Low in the Extreme Precipitation Event in Hiroshima on 19 August 2014

Journal

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
Volume 144, Issue 3, Pages 1145-1160

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0299.1

Keywords

Precipitation; Atm/Ocean Structure/ Phenomena; Mesoscale models; Models and modeling; Circulation/ Dynamics; Extreme events; Potential vorticity

Funding

  1. KAKENHI of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [15H02132]
  2. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [2-1503]
  3. MEXT
  4. Green Network of Excellence Program
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H02132] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Precipitation in excess of 100 mm h(-1) in Hiroshima, Japan, on 19 August 2014, caused a flash flood that resulted in 75 deaths and destroyed 330 houses. This study examined the meteorological background of this fatal flood. During this event, considerable filamentary transport of water vapor from the Indochina Peninsula to the Japanese islands occurred, forming a so-called atmospheric river (AR). This AR had a deep structure with an amount of free tropospheric moisture comparable with that of the boundary layer. Furthermore, a cutoff low (COL), detached from the subtropical jet over the central Pacific, moved northwestward to the Japanese islands. Instability associated with the cold core of the COL and dynamical ascent induced in front of it, interacted with the free tropospheric moisture of the AR, which caused the considerable precipitation in Hiroshima. Moreover, the mountains of the Japanese islands played a role in localizing the precipitation in Hiroshima. These roles were separately evaluated on the basis of sensitivity experiments with a cloud-resolving model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available