4.7 Article

Anisotropic response of additively manufactured 316 L stainless steel towards low-temperature gaseous carburization

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 470, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129874

Keywords

Austenitic stainless steel; Additive manufacturing; Low-temperature gaseous carburization; Microstructure; Hardness; Residual stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-temperature gaseous carburization (LTGC) was used to modify the surface properties of austenitic stainless steel fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF). During LTGC, a carburized case of expanded austenite forms at the surface, which has high surface carbon content (-2.5 wt%), high nano hardness (-12.6 GPa), large compressive residual stresses (from-2.4 GPa to-3.2 GPa), and is free of carbide precipitates. X-ray diffractometry (XRD) measurements showed anisotropic residual stresses in the expanded austenite zones, which are suggested to be caused by grain-shape anisotropy and hierarchical microstructures resulting from L-PBF.
In order to modify the surface properties of austenitic stainless steel fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF), low-temperature gaseous carburization (LTGC) was employed. During LTGC, a carburized case of expanded austenite forms at the surface, which contains a high surface carbon content (-2.5 wt%), high nano hardness (-12.6 GPa), large compressive residual stresses (from-2.4 GPa to-3.2 GPa), and is free of carbide precipitates. In the expanded austenite zones, different residual stresses were measured with X-ray diffractometry (XRD) for the top plane, i.e. in the plane perpendicular to the build direction, and for the side plane. This anisotropy is suggested to be caused by grain-shape anisotropy for the different specimen planes and inherent to the hierarchical microstructures resulting from L-PBF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available