4.7 Review

No-Reflow Post-Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms, Measurements, and Molecular Markers

Journal

STROKE
Volume 54, Issue 9, Pages 2472-2480

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044240

Keywords

biomarkers; inflammation; reperfusion; thrombectomy; treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute ischemic stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide, but even with reperfusion therapy, many patients fail to regain independence, a phenomenon known as no-reflow. The mechanisms and prognostic markers associated with no-reflow lack uniform measurement methods.
Acute ischemic stroke remains the primary cause of disability worldwide. For patients with large vessel occlusions, intravenous thrombolysis followed by mechanical thrombectomy remains the standard of care. Revascularization of the large vessel is typically successful. However, despite reopening of the occluded vessel, many patients fail to return to independence. Functional failure, despite macrovascular recanalization, is often referred to as the no-reflow phenomenon. Even with an extensive characterization of reperfusion in animal models, numerous mechanisms may explain no-reflow. Further, uniform measurements of this microvascular dysfunction and prognostic markers associated with no-reflow are lacking. In this review, we highlight a number of mechanisms that may explain no-reflow, characterize current multimodal measurements, and assess its molecular markers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available