4.5 Article

A point mass proposal method for Bayesian state-space model fitting

Journal

STATISTICS AND COMPUTING
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11222-023-10268-6

Keywords

Bayesian methods; Data augmentation; Hidden Markov models; Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC); State-space models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel algorithm for fitting state-space models, using Metropolis-within-Gibbs sampling guided by a deterministic hidden Markov model (HMM). The algorithm can efficiently handle highly correlated latent states and parameters, and is applicable to models that exhibit near-chaotic behavior.
State-space models (SSMs) are commonly used to model time series data where the observations depend on an unobserved latent process. However, inference on the model parameters of an SSM can be challenging, especially when the likelihood of the data given the parameters is not available in closed-form. One approach is to jointly sample the latent states and model parameters via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and/or sequential Monte Carlo approximation. These methods can be inefficient, mixing poorly when there are many highly correlated latent states or parameters, or when there is a high rate of sample impoverishment in the sequential Monte Carlo approximations. We propose a novel block proposal distribution for Metropolis-within-Gibbs sampling on the joint latent state and parameter space. The proposal distribution is informed by a deterministic hidden Markov model (HMM), defined such that the usual theoretical guarantees of MCMC algorithms apply. We discuss how the HMMs are constructed, the generality of the approach arising from the tuning parameters, and how these tuning parameters can be chosen efficiently in practice. We demonstrate that the proposed algorithm using HMM approximations provides an efficient alternative method for fitting state-space models, even for those that exhibit near-chaotic behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available