4.7 Article

The redshift evolution of escape fraction of hydrogen ionizing photons from galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 457, Issue 4, Pages 4051-4062

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw192

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; intergalactic medium; quasars: general; diffuse radiation

Funding

  1. CSIR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using our cosmological radiative transfer code, we study the implications of the updated quasi-stellar object (QSO) emissivity and star formation history for the escape fraction (f(esc)) of hydrogen ionizing photons from galaxies. We estimate the f(esc) that is required to reionize the Universe and to maintain the ionization state of the intergalactic medium in the post-reionization era. At z > 5.5, we show that a constant fesc of 0.14-0.22 is sufficient to reionize the Universe. At z < 3.5, consistent with various observations, we find that f(esc) can have values from 0 to 0.05. However, a steep rise in f(esc), of at least a factor of similar to 3, is required between z = 3.5 and 5.5. It results from a rapidly decreasing QSO emissivity at z > 3 together with a nearly constant measured H I photoionization rates at 3 < z < 5. We show that this requirement of a steep rise in f(esc) over a very short time can be relaxed if we consider the contribution from a recently found large number density of faint QSOs at z = 4. In addition, a simple extrapolation of the contribution of such QSOs to high-z suggests that QSOs alone can reionize the Universe. This implies, at z > 3.5, that either the properties of galaxies should evolve rapidly to increase the f(esc) or most of the low-mass galaxies should host massive black holes and sustain accretion over a prolonged period. These results motivate a careful investigation of theoretical predictions of these alternate scenarios that can be distinguished using future observations. Moreover, it is also very important to revisit the measurements of H I photoionization rates that are crucial to the analysis presented here.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available