4.7 Article

Construction of CdTe@?-CD@RBD nanoprobe for Fe3+-sensing based on FRET mechanism in human serum

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122645

Keywords

Quantum dots; Assembly nanomaterials; Fluorescence; Probe; FRET

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Fe3+ optical sensor was developed by linking CdTe quantum dots and a Rhodamine B derivative using gamma-cyclodextrin as a bridge. The nanoprobe displayed a response to Fe3+ through a fluorescence resonance energy transfer process. The probe showed satisfactory linearity in the fluorescent quenching between 10 and 60 μM Fe3+ concentration, with a limit of detection of 2.51 μM. The probe was successfully used for the determination of Fe3+ in human serum with high sensitivity and exceptional selectivity.
A Fe3+ optical sensor (CdTe@& gamma;-CD@RBD) has been developed by using gamma-cyclodextrin (& gamma;-CD) as a bridge to link CdTe quantum dots (QDs) and a Rhodamine B derivative (RBD). The RBD molecule can enter the cavity of the & gamma;-CD anchored onto the surfaces of the QDs. In the presence of Fe3+, the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) process from QDs to RBD will be initiated, rendering the nanoprobe to display a response to Fe3+. The degree of fluorescence quenching presented a satisfactory linearity between 10 and 60 & mu;\M with the incremental concentrations of Fe3+, and the calculated limit of detection was 2.51 & mu;\M. Through sample pretreatment procedures, the probe has been used in the determination of Fe3+ in human serum. The average recoveries in the spiking levels are ranged from 98.60 % to 107.20 % with a relative standard deviation of around 1.43 %-2.96 %. This finding leads to a method for fluorescent detection of Fe3+ with high sensitivity and exceptional selectivity. We believe that this study can give a new insight into the rational design and application of FRET-based nanoprobes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available