4.7 Article

X-ray detection of warm ionized matter in the Galactic halo

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 457, Issue 1, Pages 676-694

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2923

Keywords

Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: disc; Galaxy: halo; local interstellar matter; galaxies: ISM; X-rays: ISM

Funding

  1. INAF-PRIN grant [1.05.01.98.10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on a systematic investigation of the cold and mildly ionized gaseous baryonic metal components of our Galaxy, through the analysis of high-resolution Chandra and XMM-Newton spectra of two samples of Galactic and extragalactic sources. The comparison between lines of sight towards sources located in the disc of our Galaxy and extragalactic sources allows us for the first time to clearly distinguish between gaseous metal components in the disc and halo of our Galaxy. We find that a warm ionized metal medium (WIMM) permeates a large volume above and below the Galaxy's disc, perhaps up to the circum-galactic space. This halo WIMM imprints virtually the totality of the OI and OII absorption seen in the spectra of our extragalactic targets, has a temperature of T-WIMM(Halo) = 2900 +/- 900 K, a density < nH >(Halo)(WIMM) = 0.023 +/- 0.009 cm(-3) and a metallicity Z(WIMM)(Halo) = (0.4 +/- 0.1) Z(circle dot). Consistently with previous works, we also confirm that the disc of the Galaxy contains at least two distinct gaseous metal components, one cold and neutral (the CNMM: cold neutral metal medium) and one warm and mildly ionized, with the same temperature of the haloWIMM, but higher density (< nH >(Disc)(WIMM) = 0.09 +/- 0.03 cm(-3)) and metallicity (Z(WIMM)(Disc) = 0.8 +/- 0.1 Z(circle dot)). By adopting a simple disc+sphere geometry for the Galaxy, we estimate masses of the CNMM and the total (disc + halo) WIMM of M-CNMM less than or similar to 8 x 10(8) M-circle dot and M-WIMM similar or equal to 8.2 x 10(9) M-circle dot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available