4.7 Article

Testing gravity on large scales by combining weak lensing with galaxy clustering using CFHTLenS and BOSS CMASS

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 465, Issue 4, Pages 4853-4865

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3056

Keywords

gravitation; galaxies: statistics; cosmological parameters; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. NASA [12-EUCLID11-0004]
  2. NSF [AST1412966, AST1517593]
  3. DOE
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowships for Young Scientists
  5. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  7. Department of Energy Early Career Award programme
  8. Canadian Space Agency
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1412966] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01089, 15K17600, 15K21733] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure a combination of gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering and redshift-space distortions (RSDs) called E-G. The quantity EG probes both parts of metric potential and is insensitive to galaxy bias and sigma(8). These properties make it an attractive statistic to test lambda cold dark matter, general relativity and its alternate theories. We have combined CMASS Data Release 11 with CFHTLenS and recent measurements of beta from RSD analysis, and find E-G(z = 0.57) = 0.42 +/- 0.056, a 13 per cent measurement in agreement with the prediction of general relativity EG(z = 0.57) = 0.396 +/- 0.011 using the Planck 2015 cosmological parameters. We have corrected our measurement for various observational and theoretical systematics. Our measurement is consistent with the first measurement of EG using cosmic microwave background lensing in place of galaxy lensing at small scales, but shows 2.8 sigma tension when compared with their final results including large scales. This analysis with future surveys will provide improved statistical error and better control over systematics to test general relativity and its alternate theories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available