4.7 Article

Effect of foundation embedment ratio in suppressing seismic-induced vibrations using optimum tuned mass damper

Journal

SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107981

Keywords

Soil -structure interaction; Embedded foundation; Pulse period; Tuned mass damper; Seismic response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the optimization of tuned mass damper (TMD) parameters to mitigate dynamic responses in high-rise buildings. The research shows that the optimization of TMD is significantly affected by the embedment depth of the foundation and soil properties.
Tuned mass damper (TMD), which is used in structures to mitigate the dynamic responses caused by environmental loads, is tuned according to the dominant frequency of the structures. The dominant frequency of structure built on soil with low stiffness is significantly affected by the soil-structure interaction (SSI). In previous studies, only the surface foundation case is considered to investigate the design parameters of TMD considering SSI effects and the embedment depth of the foundation is neglected in these studies. Thus, this paper investigates the optimization of TMD for mitigation of responses of a high-rise building considering various depths of embedment and soil properties. The optimum parameters of TMD are investigated using five different optimization algorithms (i.e., simulated annealing, sequential quadratic programming, genetic algorithm, pattern search, and particle swarm optimization). The objective function minimizes the peak acceleration amplitude at the top of the structure. The effectiveness of optimum TMD is verified to use 20 near-fault pulse-like ground motions. The comparisons show that the embedment ratio of the foundation and the soil properties significantly affect the optimization of TMD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available