4.7 Article

Bayesian 3D velocity field reconstruction with VIRBIUS

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 457, Issue 1, Pages 172-197

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2915

Keywords

methods: data analysis; methods: statistical; galaxies: statistics; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. CITA National Fellowship
  2. Government of Canada
  3. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  4. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research and Innovation
  5. Region Ile-de-France
  6. project Equip@Meso [ANR-10-EQPX-29-01]
  7. programme Investissements d'avenir [ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02]
  8. 'Programme National de Cosmologie and Galaxies' (PNCG) of CNRS/INSU, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

I describe a new Bayesian-based algorithm to infer the full three dimensional velocity field from observed distances and spectroscopic galaxy catalogues. In addition to the velocity field itself, the algorithm reconstructs true distances, some cosmological parameters and specific non-linearities in the velocity field. The algorithm takes care of selection effects, miscalibration issues and can be easily extended to handle direct fitting of e.g. the inverse Tully-Fisher relation. I first describe the algorithm in details alongside its performances. This algorithm is implemented in the VIRBIUS (VelocIty Reconstruction using Bayesian Inference Software) software package. I then test it on different mock distance catalogues with a varying complexity of observational issues. The model proved to give robust measurement of velocities for mock catalogues of 3000 galaxies. I expect the core of the algorithm to scale to tens of thousands galaxies. It holds the promises of giving a better handle on future large and deep distance surveys for which individual errors on distance would impede velocity field inference.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available