4.8 Article

Passivating Grain Boundaries via Graphene Additive for Efficient Kesterite Solar Cells

Journal

SMALL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202304866

Keywords

CZTSSe solar cells; grain boundary; graphene; Kesterite; passivation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grain boundaries (GBs) are the main cause of carrier loss in polycrystalline kesterite photovoltaic devices. This study introduces graphene as a passivator to improve the detrimental GBs. By adding graphene dispersion to the CZTSSe precursor solution, single-layer graphene is successfully incorporated into the GBs, transforming them into electrically benign regions. The efficiency of CZTSSe solar cells is significantly increased by using graphene additives.
Grain boundaries (GBs)-triggered severe non-radiative recombination is recently recognized as the main culprits for carrier loss in polycrystalline kesterite photovoltaic devices. Accordingly, further optimization of kesterite-based thin film solar cells critically depends on passivating the grain interfaces of polycrystalline Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)(4) (CZTSSe) thin films. Herein, 2D material of graphene is first chosen as a passivator to improve the detrimental GBs. By adding graphene dispersion to the CZTSSe precursor solution, single-layer graphene is successfully introduced into the GBs of CZTSSe absorber. Due to the high carrier mobility and electrical conductivity of graphene, GBs in the CZTSSe films are transforming into electrically benign and do not act as high recombination sites for carrier. Consequently, benefitting from the significant passivation effect of GBs, the use of 0.05 wt% graphene additives increases the efficiency of CZTSSe solar cells from 10.40% to 12.90%, one of the highest for this type of cells. These results demonstrate a new route to further increase kesterite-based solar cell efficiency by additive engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available