4.7 Article

Stellar mass functions: methods, systematics and results for the local Universe

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 459, Issue 2, Pages 2150-2187

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw756

Keywords

methods: data analysis; galaxies: general; galaxies: luminosity function; mass function; galaxies: statistics

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P2_138979/1, 200021_14944, 200021_143906]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. US Department of Energy
  6. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. University of Chicago
  9. Fermilab
  10. Institute for Advanced Study
  11. Japan Participation Group
  12. Johns Hopkins University
  13. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  14. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  15. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  16. New Mexico State University
  17. University of Pittsburgh
  18. Princeton University
  19. United States Naval Observatory
  20. University of Washington
  21. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_143906] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a comprehensive method for determining stellar mass functions, and apply it to samples in the local Universe. We combine the classical 1/V-max approach with STY, a parametric maximum likelihood method and step-wise maximum likelihood, a non-parametric maximum likelihood technique. In the parametric approach, we are assuming that the stellar mass function can be modelled by either a single or a double Schechter function and we use a likelihood ratio test to determine which model provides a better fit to the data. We discuss how the stellar mass completeness as a function of z biases the three estimators and how it can affect, especially the low-mass end of the stellar mass function. We apply our method to Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 data in the redshift range from 0.02 to 0.06. We find that the entire galaxy sample is best described by a double Schechter function with the following parameters: log (M*/M-circle dot) = 10.79 +/- 0.01, log(phi(*)(1)/h(3) Mpc(-3))= -3.31 +/- 0.20, alpha(1) = 1 1.69 +/- 0.10, log(phi(*)(2)/h(3) Mpc(-3))= -2.01 +/- 0.28, alpha(2) = -0.79 +/- 0.04. We also use morphological classifications from Galaxy Zoo and halo mass, overdensity, central/satellite, colour and specific star formation rate measurements to split the galaxy sample into over 130 subsamples. We determine and present the stellar mass functions and the best-fitting Schechter function parameters for each of these subsamples.phi

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available