4.7 Article

The impact of baryons on massive galaxy clusters: halo structure and cluster mass estimates

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 465, Issue 3, Pages 3361-3378

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2899

Keywords

gravitational lensing: weak; galaxies: clusters: general

Funding

  1. BIS National E-infrastructure capital grant [ST/K00042X/1]
  2. STFC [ST/H008519/1, ST/K00087X/1, ST/L000768/1]
  3. STFCDiRAC [ST/K003267/1]
  4. Durham University
  5. STFC quota studentship
  6. STFC Advanced Fellowship
  7. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC [278594]
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M000966/1, ST/F007159/1, ST/K00042X/1, ST/M007006/1, ST/L000768/1, ST/L00061X/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/J001465/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. STFC [ST/M007006/1, ST/I004459/1, ST/F007159/1, ST/K00042X/1, ST/I004459/2, ST/H008519/1, ST/L00061X/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/L000768/1, ST/J001465/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use the BAHAMAS (BAryons and HAloes of MAssive Systems) and MACSIS (MAssive ClusterS and Intercluster Structures) hydrodynamic simulations to quantify the impact of baryons on the mass distribution and dynamics of massive galaxy clusters, as well as the bias in X-ray and weak lensing mass estimates. These simulations use the subgrid physics models calibrated in the BAHAMAS project, which include feedback from both supernovae and active galactic nuclei. They form a cluster population covering almost two orders of magnitude in mass, with more than 3500 clusters with masses greater than 10(14) M-circle dot at z = 0. We start by characterizing the clusters in terms of their spin, shape and density profile, before considering the bias in both weak lensing and hydrostatic mass estimates. Whilst including baryonic effects leads to more spherical, centrally concentrated clusters, the median weak lensing mass bias is unaffected by the presence of baryons. In both the dark matter only and hydrodynamic simulations, the weak lensing measurements underestimate cluster masses by approximate to 10 per cent for clusters with M-200 = 10(15) M-circle dot and this bias tends to zero at higher masses. We also consider the hydrostatic bias when using both the true density and temperature profiles, and those derived from X-ray spectroscopy. When using spectroscopic temperatures and densities, the hydrostatic bias decreases as a function of mass, leading to a bias of approximate to 40 per cent for clusters with M-500 >= 10(15) M-circle dot. This is due to the presence of cooler gas in the cluster outskirts. Using mass weighted temperatures and the true density profile reduces this bias to 5-15 per cent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available