4.7 Article

Co3O4 nanotubes embedded in the interlayer of GO nanosheets for efficient Hg0 removal from coal flue gas

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124014

Keywords

Adsorption; GO nanosheets; Elemental mercury

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adsorption is an efficient method for removing Hg0 from coal flue gas. In this study, Co3O4 nanotubes were embedded into GO nanosheets to prepare a composite material with good dispersion. The GO-Co3O4-1-2 sorbent showed the best O beta/OT ratio and redox capacity, providing more active sites for O2 capture and activation. The Hg0 removal efficiency of GO-Co3O4-1-2 reached 94.67% with good stability.
Adsorption is an efficient and practical method to remove Hg0 from coal flue gas. Surface active oxygen of the sorbents can adsorb Hg0 forming HgO which becomes the essential factor for efficient Hg0 removal. In this study, Co3O4 nanotubes were embedded into the interlayer of GO nanosheets to prepare a composite material 3D. SEM and TEM results show that GO gives a high dispersion of Co3O4 nanotubes, which is beneficial to the adsorption and activation of O2 on Co3O4 nanotubes surface. XPS results show that when the mass ratio of GO to Co3O4 was 1:2 (Go-Co3O4-1-2), the sorbent had the best O beta/OT ratio and the best redox capacity. It means that the oxygen-containing functional groups on the GO surface can provide more active sites for the Co3O4 nanotubes to capture and activate O2 into chemisorbed oxygen. Furthermore, GO has a fast electron transfer which can improve the electron shift in the reaction of Hg0 + O2 -> HgO. As a result, the Hg0 removal efficiency of GO-Co3O4-1-2 reached 94.67% under 180,000 h-1 at 250 degrees C, and showed a good stability. The Hg0 removal mechanism and regeneration mechanism were deduced based on the XPS results of the fresh, used and regenerated sorbent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available