4.7 Article

Reactive adsorption desulfurization of FCC gasoline over self-sulfidation adsorbent

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 318, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123989

Keywords

NiSx; NiSO4; Gasoline; RADS; Self-sulfidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The NiSO4/ZnO-Al2O3-SiO2 adsorbent exhibits self-sulfidation ability and high desulfurization performance in treating model fuel. However, its performance in FCC gasoline feedstock is not well understood. The study compares the performance of the adsorbent in FCC gasoline and model fuel, and investigates the effect of hydrocarbon composition on its performance.
NiSO4/ZnO-Al2O3-SiO2 adsorbent, as a novel reactive adsorption desulfurization (RADS)adsorbent, has self-sulfidation ability and high desulfurization performance when treating model fuel. However, the RADS perfor-mance of the adsorbent under FCC gasoline feedstock is not well understood. Here, we compare the performance of the adsorbent under FCC gasoline with model fuel to test the effect of the hydrocarbon composition of the feedstock. The complex composition of FCC gasoline makes it sensitive to the nickel loading amount of the adsorbent. Under the influence of specific surface area and pore structure, the adsorbent loaded with 3 wt% nickel shows better desulfurization activity when treating FCC gasoline. As hydrocarbons in FCC gasoline compete with sulfur compounds for active Ni sites, the reaction conditions have been tested and optimized to achieve deep desulfurization while maintaining low olefin loss to ensure the octane number of the product. By experimental tests and characterization, it has been proved that NiSx and NiO acted as active Ni sites of the adsorbent. Based on these observations, the mechanism of RADS of FCC gasoline over NiSO4/ZnO-Al2O3-SiO2 adsorbent has been proposed, which provides theoretical support for the development of new adsorbents and the optimization of RADS process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available